Kuro5hin.org: technology and culture, from the trenches
create account | help/FAQ | contact | links | search | IRC | site news
[ Everything | Diaries | Technology | Science | Culture | Politics | Media | News | Internet | Op-Ed | Fiction | Meta | MLP ]
We need your support: buy an ad | premium membership

[P]
Coke and Pepsi selling Soft Drinks with high pesticide content in india

By tsk1979 in News
Thu Aug 07, 2003 at 09:09:20 PM EST
Tags: Food (all tags)
Food

Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) India has found that Coke and Pepsi are selling soft drinks with a pesticide content 30-40 times higher than EU guidelines permit. The story can be found here and here among various other sources. Coke and Pepsi have threatened to sue CSE over the findings claiming that the tests should be carried by an international body rather an the India based NGO.

Meanwhile, following the furore in the parliament, sale of soft drinks has been banned in the house. The members are even demanding a blanket ban on sale of products from these two companies.


ADVERTISEMENT
Sponsor: rusty
This space intentionally left blank
...because it's waiting for your ad. So why are you still reading this? Come on, get going. Read the story, and then get an ad. Alright stop it. I'm not going to say anything else. Now you're just being silly. STOP LOOKING AT ME! I'm done!
comments (24)
active | buy ad
ADVERTISEMENT
From the Forbes article "Twelve major cold drinks sold in and around Delhi contain a deadly cocktail of pesticide residues," CSE said in a statement. The centre said the soft drinks in India had high pesticide residues because the soft drink and bottled water industry uses an enormous amount of ground water as the basic raw material. It said total pesticides in all PepsiCo brands on average were 0.0180 milligrams (mg) a litre, 36 times higher than European Union limits, while pesticides in Coca-Cola brands on average were 0.0150 mg a litre, 30 times the limit. The report said concentration of lindane, a carcinogen that also damages the nervous system, was 0.0035 mg per litre in the popular Coca-Cola brand, 35 times higher than EU standards. The CSE said its tests, conducted over the past six months, showed the amount of DDT in Pepsi was 16 times higher than EU norms and nine times higher in Coca-Cola.

However the Cola majors are not the only ones to blame. Lax officials and disinterested politicians are responsible for letting defaulters go unpunished as long as their own pockets are filled.

Though many would argue that ground water in various industrial townships is polluted, it is no excuse for not taking enough care in purification and treatment. In fact in many places it is so polluted that normal methods of purification which are used in the US and EU may be unable to cleanse it. The sad thing is that instead of getting some lessons from the findings the parliament members are more interested in getting political mileage out of the issue. Counter charges have already started flying, and as usual the loser will be the consumer. Even if Pepsi and Coke do something about it, the groundwater that millions drink is still going to remain polluted.

Cokes troubles are on the rise with Kerela State Pollution Control Board finding high levels of cadmium in the waste from Coke's Pallakad plant and classifying it as Hazardous waste. The waste sludge was earlier being given as fertilizer to the farmers of the area.

Local issues aside, it seems that large corporations think they can get away with everything. Not just in the developing countries but also in developed nations. Enron is a recent example, and in the past also there have been class action suits which have resulted in settlements (remember Erin Brokovich?). But unless monetary compensation is supplemented with jail terms, things are not going to change much.

Coming back to the topic, the question arises are the Cola Majors guilty? The fact remains that normal purification methods may be useless in cleansing the water used in the bottling plants, but is sacrificing more advanced water treatment plants in the interest of profits justified? Sadly this story will repeat not just in India but elsewhere also without much being done about it.

Sponsors

Voxel dot net
o Managed Hosting
o VoxCAST Content Delivery
o Raw Infrastructure

Login

Related Links
o here
o here [2]
o various other sources
o sue CSE
o banned
o political mileage
o Counter
o charges
o finding high levels of cadmium
o Erin Brokovich
o Also by tsk1979


Display: Sort:
Coke and Pepsi selling Soft Drinks with high pesticide content in india | 103 comments (77 topical, 26 editorial, 0 hidden)
Heard this on the radio recently. (3.00 / 3) (#8)
by gordonjcp on Wed Aug 06, 2003 at 09:06:13 AM EST

According to the BBC, the Coca-Cola plant was selling cadmium-loaded sludge to farmers as fertiliser. Yup. Lovely.

Give a man a fish, and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish, and he'll bore you rigid with fishing stories for the rest of your life.


I don't understand this (4.30 / 13) (#10)
by RyoCokey on Wed Aug 06, 2003 at 09:19:01 AM EST

Why would you be required to sell a product with fewer hazardous chemicals than drinking water? What does it matter what the EU standard is, shouldn't any Indian regulations take precident? I wasn't aware the EU legislated for asian countries now.

Seems like a cheap NGO smear-job to me.



farmers don't break into our houses at night, steal our DVDs and piss on the floor. No
India is not in the EU (4.33 / 12) (#11)
by bobpence on Wed Aug 06, 2003 at 09:20:30 AM EST

You can't tell these companies that they suddenly must comply with EU guidelines. India may choose to adopt some EU guidelines as government regulations, just as industry standards developed in the U.S., EU, and Japan tend to be widely adopted in other nations. But with these findings unconfirmed it is just playing politics for the Indian Parliament to start pointing fingers at companies that provide local jobs and live up to local health codes.

I don't think that drinks should be unsafe. That said, it seems that EU levels may be arbitrarily low. Coca Cola and Pepsi can go to great expense to produce a cleaner end product, but cleaning up the source - the contaminated groudwater and the slack farming practices that contaminate it - would be a far better investment. If this is not done, the expense of cleaning up the soft drinks will be passed on in higher prices to people who continue to bathe and cook with poison.

Perhaps the solution, if the drinks will cost more anyway, is to inport them from plants in the United States staffed entirely with former technology workers.
"Interesting. No wait, the other thing: tedious." - Bender

Well... (3.50 / 4) (#12)
by gilrain on Wed Aug 06, 2003 at 09:22:09 AM EST

I've always argued that Coke products are better than their Pepsi equivalents. I was arguing based and complexity of taste, but at least I can definitively say that Coke products contain less pesticide than Pepsi products!

Next time someone argues in favor of Pepsi, I'm definitely going to have to bring this up. I win the argument if they keel over dead from pesticides before I do, right?

Riiight... (4.66 / 6) (#17)
by Skywise on Wed Aug 06, 2003 at 09:42:20 AM EST

It's all about the safety of India's consumers...

I notice the (now available in India) Muslim Cola Qibla-Cola isn't on the banned list...

http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/2003/06/03/stories/2003060301601800.htm

"As the House was debating the matter, Ahmed of Muslim League said as the chairman of the Committee he had ordered immediate stoppage of supply of these drinks to the Parliament House."

(this one's priceless)
http://www.rediff.com/money/2003/aug/06coke1.htm

"Similar products -- whether it is Coke, Pepsi, or any other soft drink, or medicine or pharmaceutical product -- that the MNCs sell in America and India are different," he said.

Agrees Deepan Kumar, a medical activist with Care for Health, an NGO working across the southern India villages: "Many international studies have revealed that the consumption of soft drinks is riddled with health hazards."

He says the most commonly associated health risks are obesity, diabetes and other blood sugar disorders, tooth decay, osteoporosis and bone fractures, nutritional deficiencies, heart disease, food addictions and eating disorders, neurotransmitter dysfunction from chemical sweeteners, and neurological and adrenal disorders from excessive caffeine.

"A common problem found in many teenagers in India today is general gastrointestinal distress. It may be because of the residues of pesticides in the soft drinks," Kumar told rediff.com.

http://www.mafhoum.com/press5/147E62.htm

In India's eastern city of Calcutta, dealers in foreign goods feel the aftershocks of the war particularly acutely. Two political parties in Calcutta's Communist-led West Bengal state called for a boycott of American goods, and a prominent Muslim cleric issued a fatwa against American products in protest against the US-led war on Iraq. Several weeks ago, activists vandalized a Calcutta Nike showroom. Shortly after that incident, members of the ultra-leftist People's War Group stormed a Pepsi warehouse and destroyed multiple cases of the soft drink, saying it symbolized the superpower that was trying to create a new world order. In another concerted attack, protesters in southern India forced a water-bottling unit owned by Coca-Cola to shut down for several days.


This version is greatly improved (3.00 / 3) (#20)
by HidingMyName on Wed Aug 06, 2003 at 11:56:47 AM EST

The original version I saw this morning was a bit too heavy on opinion and didn't present as many supporting facts as I would have liked to have seen.

However, I think the real issue is did Coca Cola and Pepsi break the actual laws in effect in India at the time of the software bottling/production? I'm not a lawyer and don't really know Indian law, but if they were in compliance at the time of bottling, then I'm not sure how they can be guilty (unless Indian law allows ex post facto convictions). Furthermore, I'd be very curious to know if ground water contamination has lead to high concentrations of similar chemicals in other products.

Finally I'll conclude with minor editorial remark, please change the phrase:

Cokes troubles are on the rise with Kerela State Pollution Control Board ...
To instead read
Coke's troubles...


cheap shot by an unknown NGO (4.61 / 13) (#22)
by khallow on Wed Aug 06, 2003 at 02:05:43 PM EST

Last I checked, India wasn't part of the EU. Hence, not adhering to EU standards isn't illegal for soda bottlers (not just Coke and Pepsi!). Second, I see no reasoned discussion on the actual danger of these levels of pesticides. Finally, the CSE has no credibility to me. How do we known these alleged pesticide levels are accurate? Far as I know, it may be just another tool for Indian politicians to extort money from foreign corporations. Finally as noted in the story, it turns out that the water supply is beyond the control of the soda bottlers anyway. Hence, we're getting worked over things that are also the responsibility of the Indian government.

Local issues aside, it seems that large corporations think they can get away with everything. Not just in the developing countries but also in developed nations. Enron is a recent example, and in the past also there have been class action suits which have resulted in settlements (remember Erin Brokovich?). But unless monetary compensation is supplemented with jail terms, things are not going to change much.

Water quality is a local issue in India. Hence, this paragraph is moot. Large corporations don't think that they "can get away with everything". They have obligations and little real power. Enron, the nefarious example given above, resorted to fraud precisely because it couldn't afford continually report losses in boom years. Ie, the executives couldn't get away with reporting the true accounting picture and keeping their jobs.

To summarize, there's no story. For these reasons, I voted -1.

Stating the obvious since 1969.

Water standards in India (4.80 / 5) (#27)
by NaCh0 on Wed Aug 06, 2003 at 08:20:49 PM EST

It would be interesting to know how the water standards differ between India and the EU. CSE forgot to mention this little data point.

--
K5: Your daily dose of socialism.
The good news (2.50 / 12) (#29)
by A Proud American on Wed Aug 06, 2003 at 08:44:23 PM EST

The coding job that an Indian's now doing might soon be your responsibility once again.

Congrats unemployed Lunix'ers!

____________________________
The weak are killed and eaten...


Devils advocate (4.68 / 16) (#30)
by godix on Wed Aug 06, 2003 at 08:48:50 PM EST

From the report: "Twelve major cold drinks sold in and around Delhi contain a deadly cocktail of pesticide residues". WTF? *TWELVE* of them? I could see a bad business slipping one in, but 12 colas from different companies? It does sound like there's one hell of a problem and I doubt it's the Coke or Pepsi.

Exactly how objective can an organization using phrases like 'deadly cocktail' be? I expect this language from whining politicians not a NGO dedicated to getting at the truth. Sounds like someone is trying a hatchett job on cola companies and we all can guess how accurate the facts from a hatchett job are.

India isn't part of EU. There was an entire non-violent revolution over exact this point. EU guidelines on colas have as much to do with India as Indian laws of cattle treatment have to do with the EU. That this report goes out of it's way to paint colas as bad by a foreign countries regulations indicates to me that the colas are perfectly fine under Indias regulations (although I could be wrong, I don't know jack about Indian good regulation laws).

Let me get this straight. Coke's waste products are high in cadmium, which indicates that coke is removing cadmium from the actual product. Where exactly is the problem here? Would you rather Coke not removed the cadmium from their product so their waste is clean? Oh, wait, they're being accused of exactly that. Nevermind, apperently Coke has developed a magic process to remove enough cadmium to be called 'hazardous waste' AND still leave enough in the product to kill people. Almost sounds like a James Bond villians plot to destroy the world.

Pepsi and Coke offer to have their product tested by basically anyone in the world at any time to prove they're safe and you think the loser is the public? I can't even imagine how braindead you have to be to seriously think this.

You, and all the articles your linking to, seem to miss the central point. The central point is not how many pesticides are or aren't in colas. The central point is how many pesticides are in the local water supply the colas use. Quit whining that the Cola plants should clean up the water and start questioning why the government isn't. That's a solution that will help a whole lot of people besides just cola drinkers. Of course, it's also a solution the requires India to take responsability for it's own enviroment, change their actions that are harmful, and clean up their mess. Apperently it's easier to just bitch about foreign companies and keep the bad water.

"Fuck... may be appropriate in certain venues... (Florida Elections Commission, speed eating contests, public defender offices) and may be inappropriate in

Just further proof... (3.62 / 8) (#32)
by skyknight on Wed Aug 06, 2003 at 09:05:19 PM EST

the amount of DDT in Pepsi was 16 times higher than EU norms and nine times higher in Coca-Cola

that Coke is better than Pepsi.



It's not much fun at the top. I envy the common people, their hearty meals and Bruce Springsteen and voting. --SIGNOR SPAGHETTI
I had a vanilla pepsi today. (3.83 / 6) (#38)
by Work on Wed Aug 06, 2003 at 10:45:11 PM EST

Seriously, it exists here in Houston.

However, the 'vanilla' part I'm suspect about. My belief is its just relabeled indian pepsi and that odd flavor was the pesticides.

Coke and Pepsi lose (3.66 / 9) (#39)
by Tatarigami on Wed Aug 06, 2003 at 10:52:17 PM EST

Can they deny knowing the water was dangerous? No. That would be the same as admitting they don't know what they're putting in their products and risking consumer panic in their other markets.

Seems to me that regardless of what the Indian government and other local suppliers are doing, the only way Coke and Pepsi can defend themselves is by pointing out that they're doing business in a country that doesn't mind if they poison their customers. Which still isn't good.

This whole thing is going to degenerate into corporate whining: "They really wanted our product -- they didn't care if it was contaminated! And, and, the government said it's okay! Heck, everyone else gets to do it, why can't we? It's not fair, you're just picking on us because we're one of the most profitable companies in the world!"

India needs more pesticides (4.66 / 3) (#40)
by IHCOYC on Wed Aug 06, 2003 at 11:08:35 PM EST

In India, the liberal use of pesticides would seem to do more to promote wellbeing than avoiding them as contaminants. If there are larger trace amounts of pesticides in these drinks than would be tolerated by regulators in places where mosquito and parasite diseases aren't quite such a problem, it doesn't follow that the soft drink companies are being careless.
 --
Quod sequitur, sicut serica lucis albissima tingere rogant;
Quod sequitur, totum devorabit.

http://www.fanta.dk/ (4.00 / 2) (#41)
by siberian on Wed Aug 06, 2003 at 11:51:19 PM EST

Who cares when they bring us fun website like this! http://www.fanta.dk

Fanta Shokata!

People dont care (3.00 / 10) (#45)
by gokul on Thu Aug 07, 2003 at 12:56:36 AM EST

If the same level of pesticides or other materials had been found in Europe or US, you bet there would have been thousands of litigations by now, plus half of the forum posters whining about how they never liked Coke and Pepsi in the first place.

When the same thing happens in India, the nature of comments suddenly change to how its the Indian system thats responsible, not the American colas. Most of the posts I see below are jokes on how Coke can prove they are better than Pepsi. 'A Proud American' seems happy that Indians will die so that jobs will flow back to the US.

Seriosly, I doubt there is a point about debating with people who cant see anything beyond their noses.

-1, too India-centric (2.50 / 12) (#48)
by grouse on Thu Aug 07, 2003 at 01:48:05 AM EST


You sad bastard!

"Grouse please don't take this the wrong way... To be quite frank, you are throwing my inner Chi out of its harmonious balance with nature." -- Tex Bigballs

Spin (4.00 / 6) (#49)
by lauraw on Thu Aug 07, 2003 at 01:48:35 AM EST

I love the spin that different publications put on this:

They aren't answering the important question. (4.71 / 7) (#55)
by mjfgates on Thu Aug 07, 2003 at 06:17:22 AM EST

So, does the cola in India have more pesticides in it than the drinking water from the general area where the bottling plants sit? If so, there's a story here-- adding poison to drinks is Bad. If not, there isn't-- expecting soda companies, and ONLY soda companies, to miraculously clean up their water is just stupid. I don't see any kind of comparison between the water and the Coke yet, and until it's there nobody can really say whether there's reason to point fingers at the soda companies.

Hype (2.66 / 3) (#65)
by sellison on Thu Aug 07, 2003 at 08:21:17 PM EST

the real danger to Indians is not the minor danger of pollution hyped by the anti-capitalists in the liberal press, rather it is from God's righteous wrath for the terrible way they treat His people, the meek Christian Dalits.

"Thus, dalits who have converted to Christianity have lost the constitutional safeguards given to the Scheduled Castes of three other religions. This has increased their vulnerability."
http://www.dalitchristians.com/Html/dalitrights.htm

And some on these pages have had the gall to call India the world's largest democracy, when in fact it is a socialist heathen state where state discrimination is actively pursued against Christians!

For shame!


"No, I don't know that atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered as patriots. This is one nation under God."- George H.W. Bush

ATCA (2.50 / 2) (#76)
by sly on Fri Aug 08, 2003 at 02:21:38 AM EST

Legal question from an ignorant undergrad:

Just wondering... Could Coke/Pepsi be prosecuted in the U.S. under the Alien Tort Claims Act (28 U.S.C. § 1350) citing the Universal Declaration on Human Rights or other international covenants on human rights?
I've got some cereal in my pocket.

Pesticide in Coke and Pepsi (2.40 / 5) (#80)
by HermanMcGuigan on Fri Aug 08, 2003 at 06:28:35 AM EST

Coke and Pepsi are selling soft drinks with a pesticide content 30-40 times higher than EU guidelines permit

But isn't pesticide good for you? The Atkins diet encourages consuming vast quantities of animal fat and dairy products full of harmful hormones, so why not pesticide too?

Here's an idea: perhaps we shouldn't stand for any pesticide in our drinks, or people trying to claim that large-scale dairy and meat consumption is healthy.

No, I don't see a difference. All I see is people encouraging consumers to poison themselves and profiting as a result.



Are Coke/Pepsi really responsible? (none / 0) (#85)
by termv on Sat Aug 09, 2003 at 12:13:25 AM EST

Do the soft drink manufacturers not just sell syrup to local producers who have licensed the brand name? If so many soft drink brands suffer from the same problem, the fault must lie with India's own environmental conditions or standards.

From Coke / Pepsi's perspective, it does not help the brand if the bottling company is putting contaminated water into their product. Unfortunately for them, the likely thing for politicians to do is to blame the whole mess on the cola companies and use that as a platform for toughening environmental regulations.

Or am I just being cynical again?

Pretty ironic (4.00 / 1) (#86)
by Blarney on Sat Aug 09, 2003 at 02:50:42 AM EST

It's kind of ironic that Coke and Pepsi were selling drinks made with poisoned water in India, considering that Indian standards for soft drinks are so stringent that they actually prohibit Mountain Dew. Drinks containing brominated vegetable oil are illegal there, as BVO is considered poisonous and possibly carcinogenic - not without reason. Most pesticides are halogenated hydrocarbons, a class of compounds which does not occur in Nature and are often toxic or carcinogenic - just like BVO, a mixture of halogenated hydrocarbons.

So despite the Indian prohibition of soft drinks containing halogenated hydrocarbons, Coke and Pepsi cleverly found a way to sell them anyway! Makes you wonder if they're just trying to poison everyone in the world.

Well, I gotta go, got to refill my glass of cola.

It seems to me that... (4.00 / 4) (#87)
by Dracolith on Sat Aug 09, 2003 at 03:01:17 AM EST

The people of India have zero reasonable expectation that Coke and Pepsi will/can overcome the fact that the drinking water available in the area contains enough pesticide to be considered contaminated by outside standards and provide them with a product that is purer than their local water supply.

Unless of course they were selling their product on the basis of the claim that it was safer for people to drink than their local water.

If the local water was safe, then so was their product. If the local water was not safe, then their product is still not the major issue as it is not less or inferior to the norm, but (in all likelihood) better than the available water, seeing they have some purification.

The only way the bottler's are to blame for contaminants is if they failed to perform the basic research, knew a contaminant was a risk but failed to monitor levels it, choose dirty sources of their products components [where they could choose], or they themselves added contaminants directly.

Since when were Corn Syrup drinks claimed to be super-safe or super-healthy anyhow?

Does someone have evidence (with multiple good references) that those sorts of pesticides at the levels reported are even harmful to humans?



Government Supression? (3.50 / 2) (#95)
by Akshay on Sat Aug 09, 2003 at 06:21:25 AM EST

Hate sounding like one of those X-phile lunatics, but there's an article in a local newspaper suggesting that the central government has asked a lab (The National Institute of Nutrition?) to supress its data on pesticide contamination in food.

Deccan Chronicle is known to be sensationalist, and will drop the article in a day, so here's the article in full text anyway:-

Hyderabad, Aug 8: It's not just soft drinks which are loaded with high levels of poisonous chemicals. Fresh fruits and vegetables, milk, cheese, ice creams, sweets, and chicken too have residues of harmful chemicals in them, scientists said.

A WHO study several years back had revealed that pesticide levels even in human milk in India were alarmingly high, Prof S A Abbasi, senior professor and director, Centre for Pollution Control and Energy Technology at the Pondicherry University, said.

Laboratory studies have shown that more than 60 per cent of vegetable and fruit samples collected from different parts of Andhra Pradesh are contaminated with harmful pesticides. Experts are particularly alarmed over the presence of DDT in samples of fruits and vegetables grown in the State.

According to a report of the Food Protectants and Infestation Control Department of the Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysore, high levels of DDT residues had been reported from Andhra Pradesh, "probably due to intensive application of DDT for vector control under the malaria irradiation programme".

Agro-products grown in the State are so contaminated with pesticides that several European nations have imposed restrictions on their import. The situation is so alarming that the Central government has reportedly instructed a major public laboratory in the city not to publish its test findings in the annual report.

"We used to carry the details in our publications till two years ago. Now we have been asked to report the data only to Delhi," a senior official admitted.

As against the maximum residual value of 5 ppm fixed for DDT by the WHO and the Food and Agriculture Organisation, samples from the State contained DDT up to 3 ppm. Though the residual level is below the MRL, the very presence of DDT points to the extent of pesticide contamination in food products.

Studies by the city-based NIN on 68 fruit and vegetable samples and the Pesticide Residue Laboratory of Angrau on scores of samples revealed that most of the fruits and vegetables tested were contaminated with pesticides and insecticides. Agro products like guava, banana and leafy vegetables were relatively free of contaminants.

While NIN conducted tests on 10 varieties of grapes, apples, mangoes, potatoes, beans, carrots and tomatoes, the university laboratory studied lady fingers, tomatoes, mangoes, grapes, brinjals and cauliflower.

The agro products were obtained both directly from fields and from city markets. Vegetables are grown on just three per cent of the total cultivable area in the State and yet the pesticide consumption is as high as 14 per cent. Taking body weight into account, children consume three to 21 times more of these agro products than adults do, exposing them to higher risk.

"The pesticide residues are well within the MRL values. Even these quantities can be eliminated by thoroughly washing the vegetables or fruits. About 90 per cent of the residues can be eliminated from wheat and rice by washing the grains several times. The toxicity or otherwise of these pesticides depend on the acceptable daily intake ratio", NIN deputy director S Babu told Deccan Chronicle.

The studies revealed the presence of harmful chemicals like carbaril, monocrotofos, phosalone, dimethioate, cypermethrin, feneolerate, Melathion, phanpimethane, mithamil, prophenophos, permethrin, metalaxil, diethane M45, ridonil MZ, carbandizam, diophinatemythyl and deltamethrin.

According to Central Integrated Pest Management Centre sources, Guntur, Prakasam, Krishna, Khammam and Warangal districts are notorious for their high intake of pesticides.

Hmmm.

DDT isn't really bad for you (5.00 / 1) (#101)
by snacky on Sun Aug 10, 2003 at 09:25:04 AM EST

DDT is almost completely harmless in humans, even in doses many times larger than what's found in Indian water. Numerous studies have been performed showing with high confidence that it is not even slightly correlated with cancer. Indeed, the original reason DDT became popular in the 1940's was because it was found to be dramatically safer than any other pesticide. During World War II was commonly applied directly to humans as a delousing method, and even as a mosquito repellant. It probably sickened not a single person, there's no doubt that it saved a few people from typhoid fever and mosquito-bourne diseases. More importantly, it's saving a couple million from death every single year due to malaria - most of these lives saved are children, and mostly in India.

Since the publication of Rachel Carson's highly irresponsible and mostly unresearched Silent Spring, voluminous research has debunked nearly all of the negative claims about DDT. The Western world has mostly ignored the new findings, both because we have strong environmental lobbies and because in our countries we can afford more expensive (but less safe) non-persistant pesticides. In the third world, however, it's a life-and-death issue, and some countries do not bow to Western pressure. Check this interesting article for an example of the problem.

As for the other pesticides besides DDT, some of them are bad for humans in large doses and can really fuck with your enzyme processes. In small doses, they may be almost completely harmless, though. It's kind of like cyanide - we need it in order to have any vitamin b12, and it's contained in a wide variety of good food - cherries, almonds, nutmeg, lima beans, and of course Cassava. But in huge quantities it overwhelms your body's cyanide-processing enzyme (rhodanase), and that's when it can kill you. With many pesticides, it's kind of the same way.... except I'm pretty sure there are no pesticides that are used to form vitamins :-)

--
I like snacks

Coke and Pepsi selling Soft Drinks with high pesticide content in india | 103 comments (77 topical, 26 editorial, 0 hidden)
Display: Sort:

kuro5hin.org

[XML]
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. The Rest © 2000 - Present Kuro5hin.org Inc.
See our legalese page for copyright policies. Please also read our Privacy Policy.
Kuro5hin.org is powered by Free Software, including Apache, Perl, and Linux, The Scoop Engine that runs this site is freely available, under the terms of the GPL.
Need some help? Email help@kuro5hin.org.
My heart's the long stairs.

Powered by Scoop create account | help/FAQ | mission | links | search | IRC | YOU choose the stories!