An earlier post begged readers:
Someone, please, show me where in the gospels Jesus says anything about persecuting those who did not have faith in him. You won't, because he says quite the opposite: love those who hate you, and do good to those who persecute you.
I'd reply to that directly, but I hope that my post has more to say than simply answering that question and being done with it.
At any rate.
Jesus pronounced that he was identical with the God of the Old Testament called Jehovah on several occasions (one is John x 30). This claim to oneness with God renders Jesus liable for any mistakes Jehovah may have
According to the scriptures themselves which anyone may freely search, God advised, permitted, or countenanced:
Deception (Ezek xiv, 9) , stealing (Ex iii, 21-22) , murder (Deut vii 16), killing of witches (Ex xxii 8), slavery (Lev xxv, 44-46), capital punishment for rebellious sons (Deut xxi 18-21), and other acts representing the concepts of this pre-industrial, pre-scientific society.
As for Jesus himself, well. He wasn't always the protector of peace and harmony that he is revered as. In several cases, Jesus threatens unbelievers with the idea of a physical Hell in which people spend eternity in torment for the 'sin' of disbelief. (see Mark ix 43, Matt xxiii 33, Luke xiii 3 Mark iii 29, and many others).
Jesus threatened his hearers with death if they did not agree with him (Luke xiv 26, John viii 24).
Several comments made by Jesus show a remarkable acceptance of the violence and strife that affects the planet. Matt xxiv 6-7, Mark xiii 7-8, Luke xxi 9-10, and several others all include remarks which accept war: "For Nation shall rise against Nation, and Kingdom against Kingdom" he would say, including a warning to all his listeners to not be afraid when they heard of wars in far off places. These statements show that he believed war to be inevitable. Did he not feel competent enough to counteract mass militia? He offers no pacifist solutions for settling international disputes, no policy of war resistance, and no peaceful substitute for war between nations. He advocated "Love thy neighbor" but never criticized war.
Other remarks of Jesus favor violence. "Suppose ye that I come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay, but rather, division." (Luke xii 21-22.) "Think not that I come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword." (Matt x 34.)
In Matt xxvi 52, we find Jesus preparing his disciples with weapons. "He that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one... And they said, Lord, behold, here are two swords. And he said unto them, That is enough." Thus did the supposedly nonviolent Jesus arm his followers with swords. True, they were for defense only, and Jesus did in fact discourage their use when the disciples thought they should strike, but nevertheless, he armed his followers instead of adhering to his principle of non-resistance. He did not set a positive example of disarmament.
Jesus took diametrically opposed positions, since the use of swords and the principle of non-resistance are mutually exclusive. He preached non-violence while arming his companions with swords.
From these examples and many others, I can't sit here and listen to everyone say "The bullies weren't true Christians, because they were mean and borderline violent, and that isn't the way of Christ."
It seems to me that they were doing a pretty good job of executing the program that Jesus had set forth.
It's my opinion that in general, the world would be a much more peaceful place without religion; so much of the strife and hate stems from petty disagreements regarding doctrines.
I see a lot of people trying to dismiss the entire case as being secular: "The teasing wasn't really about religion, it was about being different. They simply found a way in which this girl was different and exploited it."
That may well be true; kids will tease each other about their weight, gender, size, even their name. However, with most other exploits, the victim can at least shrug it off with "hey, it isn't my fault I'm ugly/fat/small/have a funny name". Relentlessly attacking someone's personal set of beliefs, it seems to me, is much more damaging, as it implies that this person is evil because they chose to be.
mirrorshades radio - darkwave, synthpop, industrial, futurepop.
|
|